[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190913134243.3zoliue6yqfzyatl@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 15:42:43 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Sean V Kelley <sean.v.kelley@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [BUG RT] backtrace on v5.2.9-rt3
On 2019-08-30 12:01:06 [-0400], Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> I'm triggering the following call splat on 5.2-rt.
>
> [ 63.099414] 006: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:968
> [ 63.108423] 006: in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 173, name: kworker/6:1
…
> [ 63.141041] 006: Call Trace:
> [ 63.143916] 006: dump_stack+0x5c/0x80
> [ 63.147654] 006: ___might_sleep.cold.92+0x8d/0x9a
> [ 63.152423] 006: rt_spin_lock+0x31/0x40
> [ 63.156332] 006: intel_engine_breadcrumbs_irq+0x56/0x320 [i915]
> [ 63.162350] 006: intel_engine_signal_breadcrumbs+0x11/0x20 [i915]
> [ 63.168540] 006: i915_hangcheck_elapsed+0x199/0x420 [i915]
…
> [ 63.309375] 006: process_one_work+0x1e8/0x4c0
…
> Attached is the config and the full dmesg.
just for book keeping: Clark reported the same thing, posted patches and
will try an alternative on Monday (as far as I'm been told). I will
continue to reply in the other thread.
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists