lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6d33a9fd-47bb-a041-cd18-d67605edae54@shipmail.org>
Date:   Fri, 13 Sep 2019 18:08:57 +0200
From:   Thomas Hellström (VMware) 
        <thomas_os@...pmail.org>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, pv-drivers@...are.com,
        linux-graphics-maintainer@...are.com,
        Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
        Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>,
        Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/7] drm/ttm: TTM fault handler helpers

On 9/13/19 5:18 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 11:32:09AM +0200, Thomas Hellström (VMware) wrote:
>> +vm_fault_t ttm_bo_vm_fault_reserved(struct vm_fault *vmf,
>> +				    pgprot_t prot,
>> +				    pgoff_t num_prefault)
>> +{
>> +	struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma;
>> +	struct vm_area_struct cvma = *vma;
>> +	struct ttm_buffer_object *bo = (struct ttm_buffer_object *)
>> +	    vma->vm_private_data;
> It's a void *.  There's no need to cast it.
>
> 	struct ttm_buffer_object *bo = vma->vm_private_data;
>
> conveys exactly the same information to both the reader and the compiler,
> except it's all on one line instead of split over two.

Indeed.

However since this is mostly a restructuring commit and there are a 
couple of these present in the code I'd like to keep cleanups separate.

Thanks,
Thomas


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ