[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7625fe37-1710-056d-fb9e-39c33fd962a1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 18:48:28 +0200
From: Ferry Toth <fntoth@...il.com>
To: "Shevchenko, Andriy" <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>,
"Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@...el.com>
Cc: Nikolaus Voss <nv@...n.de>,
"Schmauss, Erik" <erik.schmauss@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...ica.org" <devel@...ica.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"nikolaus.voss@...wensteinmedical.de"
<nikolaus.voss@...wensteinmedical.de>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPICA: make acpi_load_table() return table index
Hello all,
Sorry to have sent our message with cancelled e-mail address. I have
correct this now.
Op 13-09-19 om 17:12 schreef Shevchenko, Andriy:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 05:20:21PM +0300, Moore, Robert wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Nikolaus Voss [mailto:nv@...n.de]
>> Sent: Friday, September 13, 2019 12:44 AM
>> To: Moore, Robert <robert.moore@...el.com>
>> Cc: Shevchenko, Andriy <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>; Schmauss, Erik <erik.schmauss@...el.com>; Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>; Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>; Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>; Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>; Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>; linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org; devel@...ica.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Ferry Toth <ftoth@...fort.nl>; nikolaus.voss@...wensteinmedical.de
>> Subject: RE: [PATCH] ACPICA: make acpi_load_table() return table index
>>
>> Bob,
>>
>> On Thu, 12 Sep 2019, Moore, Robert wrote:
>>> The ability to unload an ACPI table (especially AML tables such as
>>> SSDTs) is in the process of being deprecated in ACPICA -- since it is
>>> also deprecated in the current ACPI specification. This is being done
>>> because of the difficulty of deleting the namespace entries for the
>>> table. FYI, Windows does not properly support this function either.
>>
>> ok, I see it can be a problem to unload an AML table with all it's consequences e.g. with respect to driver unregistering in setups with complex dependencies. It will only work properly under certain conditions
>> - nevertheless acpi_tb_unload_table() is still exported in ACPICA and we should get this working as it worked before.
>>
>> AcpiTbUnloadTable is not exported, it is an internal interface only -- as
>> recognized by the "AcpiTb".
>
> In Linux it became a part of ABI when the
>
> commit 772bf1e2878ecfca0d1f332071c83e021dd9cf01
> Author: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
> Date: Fri Jun 9 20:36:31 2017 +0200
>
> ACPI: configfs: Unload SSDT on configfs entry removal
>
> appeared in the kernel.
And the commit message explains quite well why it is an important feature:
"This allows to change SSDTs without rebooting the system.
It also allows to destroy devices again that a dynamically loaded SSDT
created.
This is widely similar to the DT overlay behavior."
>> I'm not sure that I want to change the interface
>> to AcpiLoadTable just for something that is being deprecated. Already, we
>> throw an ACPI_EXCEPTION if the Unload operator is encountered in the AML byte
>> stream. The same thing with AcpiUnloadParentTable - it is being deprecated.
>>
>> ACPI_EXCEPTION ((AE_INFO, AE_NOT_IMPLEMENTED,
>> "AML Unload operator is not supported"));
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists