[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190913073752.GA4520@8bytes.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:37:52 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...gutronix.de,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] iommu: pass cell_count = -1 to
of_for_each_phandle with cells_name
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 09:43:53AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 02:52:10PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > Acked-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
>
> Does this ack mean that Rob is expected to apply this together with
> patch 2?
"Expected" is a strong word. I'd more phrase it like I am fine with this
patch going through his tree.
Regards,
Joerg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists