linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] iommu: pass cell_count = -1 to of_for_each_phandle with cells

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:37:52 +0200
From:   Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To:     Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...gutronix.de,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] iommu: pass cell_count = -1 to
 of_for_each_phandle with cells_name

On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 09:43:53AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 02:52:10PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > Acked-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
> 
> Does this ack mean that Rob is expected to apply this together with
> patch 2?

"Expected" is a strong word. I'd more phrase it like I am fine with this
patch going through his tree.

Regards,

	Joerg