linux-kernel - Re: [HELP REQUESTED from the community] Was: Staging status of speakup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190915134300.GA552892@kroah.com>
Date:   Sun, 15 Sep 2019 15:43:00 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Okash Khawaja <okash.khawaja@...il.com>
Cc:     Gregory Nowak <greg@...gn.net>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        Simon Dickson <simonhdickson@...il.com>,
        "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." 
        <speakup@...ux-speakup.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        John Covici <covici@....covici.com>
Subject: Re: [HELP REQUESTED from the community] Was: Staging status of
 speakup

On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 10:08:35PM +0100, Okash Khawaja wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 3:55 AM Gregory Nowak <greg@...gn.net> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 08, 2019 at 10:43:02AM +0100, Okash Khawaja wrote:
> > > Sorry, I have only now got round to working on this. It's not complete
> > > yet but I have assimilated the feedback and converted subjective
> > > phrases, like "I think..." into objective statements or put them in
> > > TODO: so that someone else may verify. I have attached it to this
> > > email.
> >
> > I think bleeps needs a TODO, since we don't know what values it accepts, or
> > what difference those values make. Also, to keep things uniform, we
> > should replace my "don't know" for trigger_time with a TODO. Looks
> > good to me otherwise. Thanks.
> 
> Great thanks. I have updated.
> 
> I have two questions:
> 
> 1. Is it okay for these descriptions to go inside
> Documentation/ABI/stable? They have been around since 2.6 (2010). Or
> would we prefer Documentation/ABI/testing/?

stable is fine.

thanks,

greg k-h