[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190915054901.GC11429@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 08:49:02 +0300
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, rth@...ddle.net, ink@...assic.park.msu.ru,
mattst88@...il.com, benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
mpe@...erman.id.au, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@...ibm.com, ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp,
dalias@...c.org, davem@...emloft.net, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
paul.burton@...s.com, jhogan@...nel.org, jiaxun.yang@...goat.com,
chenhc@...ote.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
anshuman.khandual@....com, tglx@...utronix.de, cai@....pw,
robin.murphy@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
len.brown@...el.com, axboe@...nel.dk, dledford@...hat.com,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mwb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
tbogendoerfer@...e.de, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
rafael@...nel.org, mhocko@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/8] mips: numa: make node_to_cpumask_map()
NUMA_NO_NODE aware for mips
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 06:15:33PM +0800, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> When passing the return value of dev_to_node() to cpumask_of_node()
> without checking the node id if the node id is NUMA_NO_NODE, there is
> global-out-of-bounds detected by KASAN.
>
> From the discussion [1], NUMA_NO_NODE really means no node affinity,
> which also means all cpus should be usable. So the cpumask_of_node()
> should always return all cpus online when user passes the node id
> as NUMA_NO_NODE, just like similar semantic that page allocator handles
> NUMA_NO_NODE.
>
> But we cannot really copy the page allocator logic. Simply because the
> page allocator doesn't enforce the near node affinity. It just picks it
> up as a preferred node but then it is free to fallback to any other numa
> node. This is not the case here and node_to_cpumask_map will only restrict
> to the particular node's cpus which would have really non deterministic
> behavior depending on where the code is executed. So in fact we really
> want to return cpu_online_mask for NUMA_NO_NODE.
>
> Since this arch was already NUMA_NO_NODE aware, this patch only changes
> it to return cpu_online_mask and use NUMA_NO_NODE instead of "-1".
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1125789/
> Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
> Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
> ---
> V3: Change to only handle NUMA_NO_NODE, and return cpu_online_mask
> for NUMA_NO_NODE case, and change the commit log to better justify
> the change.
> ---
> arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/topology.h | 4 ++--
Nit: the subject says "mips:", but this patch only touches sgi-ip27 and
loongson is updated as a separate patch. I don't see why both patches
cannot be merged. Moreover, the whole set can be made as a single patch,
IMHO.
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/topology.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/topology.h
> index 965f079..04505e6 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/topology.h
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/topology.h
> @@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ struct cpuinfo_ip27 {
> extern struct cpuinfo_ip27 sn_cpu_info[NR_CPUS];
>
> #define cpu_to_node(cpu) (sn_cpu_info[(cpu)].p_nodeid)
> -#define cpumask_of_node(node) ((node) == -1 ? \
> - cpu_all_mask : \
> +#define cpumask_of_node(node) ((node) == NUMA_NO_NODE ? \
> + cpu_online_mask : \
> &hub_data(node)->h_cpus)
> struct pci_bus;
> extern int pcibus_to_node(struct pci_bus *);
> --
> 2.8.1
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists