[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7fc4c8fd-c00e-a455-29ff-ec016cbff08a@web.de>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 08:24:49 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
Enrico Weigelt <lkml@...ux.net>,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Wen Yang <wen.yang99@....com.cn>,
Yi Wang <wang.yi59@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: Coccinelle: pci_free_consistent: Checking when constraints
> If you had made your change and tested it, it's at least highly probable
> that you would understand why it is not sufficient as well.
Where do you expect to find the information how the Coccinelle software
should handle SmPL when constraints here finally?
> You first reflex when you have a question should be to try what you are
> wondering about, not to head for the mailing list.
>
> Please stop spreading misinformation.
* How will different application views influence the desired clarification of
software behaviour also for this use case?
* Can such an open issue be resolved better?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists