[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3G_9EeK-Xp7ZeA0EN7WNzrL7AxoQcNZ8z-oe5NsTYW6g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 09:49:21 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM, arm64: Remove arm_pm_restart()
On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 5:26 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:05:06PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > From: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > This small series is preparatory work for a series that I'm working on
> > which attempts to establish a formal framework for system restart and
> > power off.
> >
> > Guenter has done a lot of good work in this area, but it never got
> > merged. I think this set is a valuable addition to the kernel because
> > it converts all odd providers to the established mechanism for restart.
> >
> > Since this is stretched across both 32-bit and 64-bit ARM, as well as
> > PSCI, and given the SoC/board level of functionality, I think it might
> > make sense to take this through the ARM SoC tree in order to simplify
> > the interdependencies. But it should also be possible to take patches
> > 1-4 via their respective trees this cycle and patches 5-6 through the
> > ARM and arm64 trees for the next cycle, if that's preferred.
> >
>
> We tried this twice now, and it seems to go nowhere. What does it take
> to get it applied ?
Can you send a pull request to soc@...nel.org after the merge window,
with everyone else on Cc? If nobody objects, I'll merge it through
the soc tree.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists