[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190916083054.GN28281@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:30:54 +0300
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] gpiolib: introduce devm_fwnode_gpiod_get_index()
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 11:13:10AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 12:40:07PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 08:22:38PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > devm_fwnode_get_index_gpiod_from_child() is too long, besides the fwnode
> > > in question does not have to be a child of device node. Let's rename it
> > > to devm_fwnode_gpiod_get_index() and keep the old name for compatibility
> > > for now.
> >
> > Shouldn't we convert all the users and drop that monstrosity
> > devm_fwnode_get_index_gpiod_from_child() completely?
>
> Yes, once we land this in 5.4 I will start blasting maintainers with
> patches.
OK, thanks for the clarification.
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists