linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: intel-spi: support chips without software sequencer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190916091920.GS28281@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 16 Sep 2019 12:19:20 +0300
From:   Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Jethro Beekman <jethro@...tanix.com>
Cc:     Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        "linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: intel-spi: support chips without
 software sequencer

On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 09:12:50AM +0000, Jethro Beekman wrote:
> On 2019-09-16 11:11, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 08:41:55PM +0000, Jethro Beekman wrote:
> >> Could someone please review this?
> >>
> >> On 2019-09-04 03:15, Jethro Beekman wrote:
> >>> Some flash controllers don't have a software sequencer. Avoid
> >>> configuring the register addresses for it, and double check
> >>> everywhere that its not accidentally trying to be used.
> > 
> > All the supported types in intel_spi_init() set ->sregs so I don't see
> > how we could end up calling functions with that not set properly. Which
> > controller we are talking about here? CNL?
> > 
> 
> Yes, see 2/2.

OK, thanks. Please mention that in the commit log as well.

The patch itself looks good to me.