linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] vimc: move duplicated IS_SRC and IS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 16 Sep 2019 07:42:03 -0300
From:   Helen Koike <helen.koike@...labora.com>
To:     Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, mchehab@...nel.org,
        andrealmeid@...labora.com, dafna.hirschfeld@...labora.com,
        hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl
Cc:     linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] vimc: move duplicated IS_SRC and IS_SINK to common
 header



On 9/15/19 8:52 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 9/15/19 1:25 PM, Helen Koike wrote:
>> Hi Shuah,
>>
>> On 9/6/19 11:42 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>> Move duplicated IS_SRC and IS_SINK dfines to common header. Rename
>>> them to VIMC_IS_SRC and VIM_IS_SINK.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/media/platform/vimc/vimc-common.h  |  4 ++++
>>>   drivers/media/platform/vimc/vimc-debayer.c | 11 ++++-------
>>>   drivers/media/platform/vimc/vimc-scaler.c  |  8 +++-----
>>>   3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vimc/vimc-common.h b/drivers/media/platform/vimc/vimc-common.h
>>> index 87ee84f78322..236412ad7548 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/vimc/vimc-common.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/vimc/vimc-common.h
>>> @@ -27,6 +27,10 @@
>>>     #define VIMC_FRAME_INDEX(lin, col, width, bpp) ((lin * width + col) * bpp)
>>>   +/* Source and sink pad checks */
>>> +#define VIMC_IS_SRC(pad)    (pad)
>>> +#define VIMC_IS_SINK(pad)    (!(pad))
>>
>> This is true now, but it might not be true in the future.
>> In the output video device (that was sent by André but not yet upstream) for instance, only have a single
>> source pad (which I suppose the index will be 0), and this macro won't be true.
>>
> 
>> Maybe we could check pad flags in sd->entity->pads[index].flags ?
>>
> 
> I think this change should be done in André's patch?

Could be yes, making it generic since the start would be nice,
but I don't mind updating this latter when needed.

Then:

Acked-by: Helen Koike <helen.koike@...labora.com>

> 
> thanks,
> -- Shuah
Thanks
Helen