[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ae469c65828443524f9ff0409f1c7a81bf64cf6b.camel@analog.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 12:37:12 +0000
From: "Ardelean, Alexandru" <alexandru.Ardelean@...log.com>
To: "broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
"baolin.wang@...aro.org" <baolin.wang@...aro.org>,
"bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com"
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"jic23@...nel.org" <jic23@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"orsonzhai@...il.com" <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
"zhang.lyra@...il.com" <zhang.lyra@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 03/15] spi: make `cs_change_delay` the first user of
the `spi_delay` logic
On Mon, 2019-09-16 at 13:25 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> [External]
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 02:45:38PM +0300, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
>
> > - u16 cs_change_delay;
> > - u8 cs_change_delay_unit;
> > + struct spi_delay cs_change_delay;
>
> This breaks the build as there is a user of this interface.
Ack.
Jonathan pointed this out.
There's a V3 that changes both this and it's user (in IIO).
V3:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20190916071024.21447-1-alexandru.ardelean@analog.com/T/#t
V2:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20190913115549.3823-1-alexandru.ardelean@analog.com/T/#t
[ archive is from the IIO list ]
Well, I'm hoping you are referring to the same user.
On a general note: I apologise for the amount of noise/spam I am doing here. Still adjusting to how to do things/changes
that touch 2 subsystems, especially when trees are not quite in-sync.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists