[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87pnk0xvht.fsf@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 15:42:54 +0300
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
ksummit-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH v2 3/3] libnvdimm, MAINTAINERS: Maintainer Entry Profile
On Fri, 13 Sep 2019, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
> And the documentation doesn't help. For example, I knew people's rules
> about capitalizing the subject but I'd just forget. I say that if you
> can't be bothered to add it to checkpatch then it means you don't really
> care that strongly.
It would be entirely possible to add the subsystem/driver specific
checkpatch rules to MAINTAINERS entries or directory specific config
files. As checkpatch options directly. For example
--strict --max-line-length=100 --ignore=BIT_MACRO,SPLIT_STRING,LONG_LINE_STRING,BOOL_MEMBER
or whatever.
SMOP. ;)
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists