lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1109991919.5481.1568644939856.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
Date:   Mon, 16 Sep 2019 10:42:19 -0400 (EDT)
From:   Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To:     Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rantala, Tommi T." <tommi.t.rantala@...ia.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        paulmck <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for 5.3 3/3] rseq/selftests: Fix: Namespace gettid() for
 compatibility with glibc 2.30

----- On Sep 14, 2019, at 3:47 PM, Sasha Levin sashal@...nel.org wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> [This is an automated email]
> 
> This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag.
> The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: all
> 
> The bot has tested the following trees: v5.2.14, v4.19.72, v4.14.143, v4.9.192,
> v4.4.192.
> 
> v5.2.14: Build OK!
> v4.19.72: Build OK!
> v4.14.143: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
>    c960e9909d33 ("rseq/selftests: Provide parametrized tests")
> 
> v4.9.192: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
>    c960e9909d33 ("rseq/selftests: Provide parametrized tests")
> 
> v4.4.192: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
>    c960e9909d33 ("rseq/selftests: Provide parametrized tests")
> 
> 
> NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.
> 
> How should we proceed with this patch?

rseq was merged into 4.18, so none of those patches are needed prior to that
kernel version.

This applies to all 3 rseq patches.

Thanks,

Mathieu


> 
> --
> Thanks,
> Sasha

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ