linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add a git and a maintainer entry to keyring subsystems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190916182332.GC16093@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 16 Sep 2019 21:23:32 +0300
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        keyrings@...r.kernel.org, Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add a git and a maintainer entry to keyring
 subsystems

On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 09:52:51AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> 
> > > I would recommend splitting the patch in two and putting something like:
> > > 
> > > 	keys: Add Jarkko Sakkinen as co-maintainer
> > > 
> > > as the subject of the keyrings maintainership one.
> > 
> > Why is there utility in micro splitting such a trivial patch?
> 
> Because the keyrings maintainership piece is addressing a major procedural
> concern on Linus's part - and I think it needs to go in its own patch with the
> subject I suggested.

I'll send separate patches tomorrow.

/Jarkko