[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190916183619.50926206C2@mail.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:36:18 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: "Kim, Cheol Yong" <cheol.yong.kim@...ux.intel.com>,
"Tanwar, Rahul" <rahul.tanwar@...ux.intel.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
Cc: andriy.shevchenko@...el.com, cheol.yong.kim@...el.com,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, mturquette@...libre.com,
qi-ming.wu@...el.com, rahul.tanwar@...el.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
robh@...nel.org, yixin.zhu@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] clk: intel: Add CGU clock driver for a new SoC
Quoting Kim, Cheol Yong (2019-09-09 07:16:29)
>
> I've discussed internally the amount of efforts to create a reusable
> regmap clock driver which might be reused by other companies too.
>
> It seems it requires significant efforts for implementation/tests. As we
> don't plan to support our old SOCs for now, I'm not sure if we need to
> put such a big efforts.
>
> Stephan,
>
> It seems you don't like both meson/qcom regmap clock implementation.
>
> What is your opinion for our current CGU clock driver implementation?
>
>
If you're not going to use regmap in CGU then it doesn't matter to try
to consolidate the regmap clk implementations.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists