linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-misc-fixes tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+E=qVfm78f+2a2s=8Q7tL-fP7xCEj0v=_JXD_XbaR-2dfXmCA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 15 Sep 2019 22:29:35 -0700
From:   Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@...il.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Qiang Yu <yuq825@...il.com>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
        Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-misc-fixes tree

On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 2:18 PM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all,

Hi Mark,

> Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:
>
>   drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c
>
> between commit:
>
>   21670bd78a25001cf8e ("drm/lima: fix lima_gem_wait() return value")
>
> from the drm-misc-fixes tree and commit:
>
>   52791eeec1d9f4a7e7f ("dma-buf: rename reservation_object to dma_resv")
>
> from the drm tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Fix looks correct to me. Sorry for not testing my patch with
linux-next, I'll make sure it at least compiles next time.

> diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c
> index b609dc030d6ca,ff3d9acc24fcf..0000000000000
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c
> @@@ -341,8 -341,8 +341,8 @@@ int lima_gem_wait(struct drm_file *file
>
>         timeout = drm_timeout_abs_to_jiffies(timeout_ns);
>
> -       ret = drm_gem_reservation_object_wait(file, handle, write, timeout);
> +       ret = drm_gem_dma_resv_wait(file, handle, write, timeout);
>  -      if (ret == 0)
>  +      if (ret == -ETIME)
>                 ret = timeout ? -ETIMEDOUT : -EBUSY;
>
>         return ret;