lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190917055512.GE2058532@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 17 Sep 2019 07:55:12 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        tiwai@...e.de, broonie@...nel.org, vkoul@...nel.org,
        jank@...ence.com, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org,
        slawomir.blauciak@...el.com,
        Bard liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rander Wang <rander.wang@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
        Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 8/9] soundwire: intel: remove platform devices and
 provide new interface

On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 04:23:41PM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> +/**
> + * sdw_intel_probe() - SoundWire Intel probe routine
> + * @parent_handle: ACPI parent handle
> + * @res: resource data
> + *
> + * This creates SoundWire Master and Slave devices below the controller.
> + * All the information necessary is stored in the context, and the res
> + * argument pointer can be freed after this step.
> + */
> +struct sdw_intel_ctx
> +*sdw_intel_probe(struct sdw_intel_res *res)
> +{
> +	return sdw_intel_probe_controller(res);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(sdw_intel_probe);
> +
> +/**
> + * sdw_intel_startup() - SoundWire Intel startup
> + * @ctx: SoundWire context allocated in the probe
> + *
> + */
> +int sdw_intel_startup(struct sdw_intel_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> +	return sdw_intel_startup_controller(ctx);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(sdw_intel_startup);

Why are you exporting these functions if no one calls them?

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ