linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM, arm64: Remove arm_pm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2y9OYL-pm38rcGvgzvjgErCUC1ckjVXhd3mb=YEXiD_g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 17 Sep 2019 09:01:45 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM, arm64: Remove arm_pm_restart()

On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 10:28 PM Thierry Reding
<thierry.reding@...il.com> wrote:
>
> All of the patches beyond the 6 in this set rely on the system reset and
> power "framework". I don't think there was broad concensus on that idea
> yet.

Ok, I see.

> If you think it's worth another try I'm happy to send the patches
> out again.

Maybe do that after we pull the first set into arm-soc then. If
we can reach consensus, I can merge them as a follow-up,
either through the soc tree as a new subsystem or through
the asm-generic tree as cross-architecture work.

      Arnd