[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190917125434.GH20778@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 14:54:34 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: tinywrkb <tinywrkb@...il.com>
Cc: Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: imx6dl: SolidRun: add phy node with 100Mb/s
max-speed
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 03:41:01PM +0300, tinywrkb wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 03:56:52PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > Tinywrkb confirmed to me in private communication that revert of
> > > 5502b218e001 fixes Ethernet for him on effected system.
> > >
> > > He also referred me to an old Cubox-i spec that lists 10/100 Ethernet
> > > only for i.MX6 Solo/DualLite variants of Cubox-i. It turns out that
> > > there was a plan to use a different 10/100 PHY for Solo/DualLite
> > > SOMs. This plan never materialized. All SolidRun i.MX6 SOMs use the same
> > > AR8035 PHY that supports 1Gb.
> > >
> > > Commit 5502b218e001 might be triggering a hardware issue on the affected
> > > Cubox-i. I could not reproduce the issue here with Cubox-i and a Dual
> > > SOM variant running v5.3-rc8. I have no Solo/DualLite variant handy at
> > > the moment.
> >
> > Could somebody with an affected device show us the output of ethtool
> > with and without 5502b218e001. Does one show 1G has been negotiated,
> > and the other 100Mbps? If this is true, how does it get 100Mbps
> > without that patch? We are missing a piece of the puzzle.
> >
> > Andrew
>
> linux-test-5.1rc1-a2703de70942-without_bad_commit
>
> Settings for eth0:
> Supported ports: [ TP MII ]
> Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
> 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
> 1000baseT/Full
So this means the local device says it can do 1000Mbps.
> Supported pause frame use: Symmetric
> Supports auto-negotiation: Yes
> Supported FEC modes: Not reported
> Advertised link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
> 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
> 1000baseT/Full
The link peer can also do 1000Mbps.
> Advertised pause frame use: Symmetric
> Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes
> Advertised FEC modes: Not reported
> Link partner advertised link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
> 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
> 1000baseT/Full
> Link partner advertised pause frame use: Symmetric
> Link partner advertised auto-negotiation: Yes
> Link partner advertised FEC modes: Not reported
> Speed: 100Mb/s
Yet they have decided to do 100Mbps.
We need to understand Why? The generic PHY driver would not do this on
its own. So i'm thinking something has poked a PHY register with some
value, and this patch is causing it to be over written.
Please can you use mii-tool -v -v to dump the PHY registers in each
case.
Thanks
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists