linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: vmd: Fix shadow offsets to reflect spec changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87f1f92276becb6f83d040b36697ef8084e63105.camel@intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 17 Sep 2019 13:55:59 +0000
From:   "Derrick, Jonathan" <jonathan.derrick@...el.com>
To:     "lorenzo.pieralisi@....com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Busch, Keith" <keith.busch@...el.com>,
        "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        "helgaas@...nel.org" <helgaas@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: vmd: Fix shadow offsets to reflect spec changes

On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 11:41 +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 07:54:35AM -0600, Jon Derrick wrote:
> > The shadow offset scratchpad was moved to 0x2000-0x2010. Update the
> > location to get the correct shadow offset.
> 
> Hi Jon,
> 
> what does "was moved" mean ? Would this code still work on previous HW ?
> 
The previous code won't work on (not yet released) hw. Guests using the
domain will see the wrong offset and enumerate the domain incorrectly.


> We must make sure that the address move is managed seamlessly by the
> kernel.
If we need to avoid changing addressing within stable, then that's
fine. But otherwise is there an issue merging with 5.4?


> 
> For the time being I have to drop this fix and it is extremely
> tight to get it in v5.4, I can't send stable changes that we may
> have to revert.
Aren't we in the beginning of the merge window?


> 
> Thanks,
> Lorenzo
> 
> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v5.2+
> > Fixes: 6788958e ("PCI: vmd: Assign membar addresses from shadow registers")
> > Signed-off-by: Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@...el.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c | 9 ++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> > index 2e4da3f51d6b..a35d3f3996d7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> > @@ -31,6 +31,9 @@
> >  #define PCI_REG_VMLOCK		0x70
> >  #define MB2_SHADOW_EN(vmlock)	(vmlock & 0x2)
> >  
> > +#define MB2_SHADOW_OFFSET	0x2000
> > +#define MB2_SHADOW_SIZE		16
> > +
> >  enum vmd_features {
> >  	/*
> >  	 * Device may contain registers which hint the physical location of the
> > @@ -578,7 +581,7 @@ static int vmd_enable_domain(struct vmd_dev *vmd, unsigned long features)
> >  		u32 vmlock;
> >  		int ret;
> >  
> > -		membar2_offset = 0x2018;
> > +		membar2_offset = MB2_SHADOW_OFFSET + MB2_SHADOW_SIZE;
> >  		ret = pci_read_config_dword(vmd->dev, PCI_REG_VMLOCK, &vmlock);
> >  		if (ret || vmlock == ~0)
> >  			return -ENODEV;
> > @@ -590,9 +593,9 @@ static int vmd_enable_domain(struct vmd_dev *vmd, unsigned long features)
> >  			if (!membar2)
> >  				return -ENOMEM;
> >  			offset[0] = vmd->dev->resource[VMD_MEMBAR1].start -
> > -						readq(membar2 + 0x2008);
> > +					readq(membar2 + MB2_SHADOW_OFFSET);
> >  			offset[1] = vmd->dev->resource[VMD_MEMBAR2].start -
> > -						readq(membar2 + 0x2010);
> > +					readq(membar2 + MB2_SHADOW_OFFSET + 8);
> >  			pci_iounmap(vmd->dev, membar2);
> >  		}
> >  	}
> > -- 
> > 2.20.1
> >