[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190917151721.GB4116@linux-8ccs>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 17:17:22 +0200
From: Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Matthias Maennich <maennich@...gle.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Martijn Coenen <maco@...roid.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the modules tree with the
compiler-attributes tree
+++ Mark Brown [16/09/19 16:59 +0100]:
>On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 11:27:20PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>> Since this conflcit is non-trivial, it's late and there's a good chance
>> I'm not going to actually finish building -next today I've just used the
>> commit from the last time -next was built, 3b5be16c7e90a69c, for the
>> modules tree - sorry. I'll have another go tomorrow. This means none
>> of the changes in modules-next are in -next as they were all committed
>> in the past week.
>
>I had another look but I'm still not comfortable doing this merge in a
>sensible timeframe so I punted again, sorry. I'll probably carry on
>doing this.
Hi Mark,
Sorry for the trouble. We are currently working out a resolution
(https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190917150902.GA4116@linux-8ccs/).
Feel free to leave it at 3b5be16c7e90a69c until this gets resolved in
the next day or two..
Thanks,
Jessica
Powered by blists - more mailing lists