lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0f2c34f5-7656-9a6f-7f86-6dd58c8f6ef7@web.de>
Date:   Tue, 17 Sep 2019 20:22:17 +0200
From:   Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        Saiyam Doshi <saiyamdoshi.in@...il.com>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v2 0/3] Fix issues reported by Coccinelle

>> * I would prefer to refer to a desired reduction of a few
>>   source code quality concerns.
>
> Not needed. I understand what is going on here.

I suggest to reconsider the interpretation of “ensurance”
after only a few source code places were adjusted.


>>> Changes in …
>>
>> Can such a prefix be omitted?
>
> Why? I think it makes sense?

Can the specification of a version identifier be occasionally
sufficient already?

Regards,
Markus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ