linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH V3 0/4] clk: imx8m: fix glitch/mux

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AM0PR04MB4481D54C4508152E458BA9BE888E0@AM0PR04MB4481.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Sep 2019 05:45:20 +0000
From:   Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        "festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
        "mturquette@...libre.com" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        "s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>
CC:     "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>,
        Jacky Bai <ping.bai@....com>, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>,
        "linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V3 0/4] clk: imx8m: fix glitch/mux

Hi Stephen,

> Subject: RE: [PATCH V3 0/4] clk: imx8m: fix glitch/mux
> 
> Quoting Peng Fan (2019-09-16 23:20:15)
> > Hi Stephen, Shawn,
> >
> > > Subject: [PATCH V3 0/4] clk: imx8m: fix glitch/mux
> >
> > Sorry to ping early. Is there a chance to land this patchset in 5.3 release?
> >
> 
> No, it won't be in 5.3 because that version is released. Shawn already sent the
> PR for 5.4 too so this will most likely be in v5.5 at the earliest.

Thanks for the info. But this patchset is bugfix, so hope this could be accepted in 5.4.

Thanks,
Peng.