linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: exfat: rebase to sdFAT v2.2.0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <201909190546.Al3zu1Yd%lkp@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 Sep 2019 05:31:43 +0800
From:   kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To:     Park Ju Hyung <qkrwngud825@...il.com>
Cc:     kbuild-all@...org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        alexander.levin@...rosoft.com, namjae.jeon@...sung.com,
        sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com, sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com,
        sj1557.seo@...sung.com, valdis.kletnieks@...edu,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linkinjeon@...il.com,
        qkrwngud825@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, dan.carpenter@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: exfat: rebase to sdFAT v2.2.0

Hi Park,

Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[cannot apply to v5.3 next-20190917]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Park-Ju-Hyung/staging-exfat-rebase-to-sdFAT-v2-2-0/20190919-040526
config: x86_64-allyesconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.4.0-13) 7.4.0
reproduce:
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make ARCH=x86_64 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/staging/exfat/super.c: In function 'exfat_debug_kill_sb':
>> drivers/staging/exfat/super.c:3079:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'exfat_cache_release'; did you mean 'exfat_dcache_release'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
       exfat_cache_release(sb);
       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
       exfat_dcache_release
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
--
   drivers/staging/exfat/misc.c: In function 'exfat_uevent_ro_remount':
>> drivers/staging/exfat/misc.c:57:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'ST_LOG'; did you mean 'DT_REG'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     ST_LOG("[EXFAT](%s[%d:%d]): Uevent triggered\n",
     ^~~~~~
     DT_REG
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

vim +3079 drivers/staging/exfat/super.c

  3063	
  3064	#ifdef CONFIG_EXFAT_DBG_IOCTL
  3065	static void exfat_debug_kill_sb(struct super_block *sb)
  3066	{
  3067		struct exfat_sb_info *sbi = EXFAT_SB(sb);
  3068		struct block_device *bdev = sb->s_bdev;
  3069	
  3070		long flags;
  3071	
  3072		if (sbi) {
  3073			flags = sbi->debug_flags;
  3074	
  3075			if (flags & EXFAT_DEBUGFLAGS_INVALID_UMOUNT) {
  3076				/* invalidate_bdev drops all device cache include dirty.
  3077				 * we use this to simulate device removal
  3078				 */
> 3079				exfat_cache_release(sb);
  3080				invalidate_bdev(bdev);
  3081			}
  3082		}
  3083	
  3084		kill_block_super(sb);
  3085	}
  3086	#endif /* CONFIG_EXFAT_DBG_IOCTL */
  3087	

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation

Download attachment ".config.gz" of type "application/gzip" (69879 bytes)