linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/16] Core scheduling v3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAERHkrsW8conSUNbbmAD7AHyRTGy=80QUiJAsx_LaJDNQoZ35g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 Sep 2019 06:16:15 +0800
From:   Aubrey Li <aubrey.intel@...il.com>
To:     Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Julien Desfossez <jdesfossez@...italocean.com>,
        Dario Faggioli <dfaggioli@...e.com>,
        "Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
        Subhra Mazumdar <subhra.mazumdar@...cle.com>,
        Vineeth Remanan Pillai <vpillai@...italocean.com>,
        Nishanth Aravamudan <naravamudan@...italocean.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Greg Kerr <kerrnel@...gle.com>, Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
        Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/16] Core scheduling v3

On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 4:41 AM Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On 9/17/19 6:33 PM, Aubrey Li wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 10:14 PM Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
> >>
> >> And I have pushed Tim's branch to:
> >> https://github.com/aaronlu/linux coresched-v3-v5.1.5-test-tim
> >>
> >> Mine:
> >> https://github.com/aaronlu/linux coresched-v3-v5.1.5-test-core_vruntime
>
>
> Aubrey,
>
> Thanks for testing with your set up.
>
> I think the test that's of interest is to see my load balancing added on top
> of Aaron's fairness patch, instead of using my previous version of
> forced idle approach in coresched-v3-v5.1.5-test-tim branch.
>

I'm trying to figure out a way to solve fairness only(not include task
placement),
So @Vineeth - if everyone is okay with Aaron's fairness patch, maybe
we should have a v4?

Thanks,
-Aubrey