lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALN7hCKMP7xr4KmnP=hzC8rsBNk5vgmvybTy+ViUw9=2A5_NBg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Sep 2019 12:08:02 +0300
From:   Elichai Turkel <elichai.turkel@...il.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: About getrandom(2) contract

Hi,

Unlike other syscalls(like `read(2)`) `getrandom(2)`'s contract
doesn't define what happens if you pass `buflen=0`, does the pointer
still has to be valid? (what does valid even mean?) are there any side
effects?
i.e. is `getrandom(0x01, 0, 0)` undefined behavior?.

Thanks,
Elichai.
-- 
PGP: 5607C93B5F86650C

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ