[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87impq7wn6.fsf@FE-laptop>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 11:59:25 +0200
From: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc: Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu@...rochip.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: atmel_ssc_dai: Remove wrong spinlock usage
Hi Alex,
> On 18/09/2019 11:41:14+0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
>> A potential bug was reported in the email "[BUG] atmel_ssc_dai: a
>> possible sleep-in-atomic bug in atmel_ssc_shutdown"[1]
>>
>> Indeed in the function atmel_ssc_shutdown() free_irq() was called in a
>> critical section protected by spinlock.
>>
>> However this spinlock is only used in atmel_ssc_shutdown() and
>> atmel_ssc_startup() functions. After further analysis, it occurred that
>> the call to these function are already protected by mutex used on the
>> calling functions.
>>
>> Then we can remove the spinlock which will fix this bug as a side
>> effect. Thanks to this patch the following message disappears:
>>
>> "BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
>> kernel/locking/mutex.c:909"
>>
>> [1]: https://www.spinics.net/lists/alsa-devel/msg71286.html
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>
>> ---
>> sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.c | 7 -------
>> 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.c b/sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.c
>> index 6f89483ac88c..365957e86419 100644
>> --- a/sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.c
>> +++ b/sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.c
>> @@ -116,19 +116,16 @@ static struct atmel_pcm_dma_params ssc_dma_params[NUM_SSC_DEVICES][2] = {
>> static struct atmel_ssc_info ssc_info[NUM_SSC_DEVICES] = {
>> {
>> .name = "ssc0",
>> - .lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(ssc_info[0].lock),
>
> This member is now unused and can be removed from the struct.
>
> Once fixed, Reviewed-by: Alexandre Belloni
> <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Indeed I wanted to do this but finally forgot.
I am sending a v2.
Thanks,
Gregory
>
>> .dir_mask = SSC_DIR_MASK_UNUSED,
>> .initialized = 0,
>> },
>> {
>> .name = "ssc1",
>> - .lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(ssc_info[1].lock),
>> .dir_mask = SSC_DIR_MASK_UNUSED,
>> .initialized = 0,
>> },
>> {
>> .name = "ssc2",
>> - .lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(ssc_info[2].lock),
>> .dir_mask = SSC_DIR_MASK_UNUSED,
>> .initialized = 0,
>> },
>> @@ -317,13 +314,11 @@ static int atmel_ssc_startup(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
>>
>> snd_soc_dai_set_dma_data(dai, substream, dma_params);
>>
>> - spin_lock_irq(&ssc_p->lock);
>> if (ssc_p->dir_mask & dir_mask) {
>> spin_unlock_irq(&ssc_p->lock);
>> return -EBUSY;
>> }
>> ssc_p->dir_mask |= dir_mask;
>> - spin_unlock_irq(&ssc_p->lock);
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> @@ -355,7 +350,6 @@ static void atmel_ssc_shutdown(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
>>
>> dir_mask = 1 << dir;
>>
>> - spin_lock_irq(&ssc_p->lock);
>> ssc_p->dir_mask &= ~dir_mask;
>> if (!ssc_p->dir_mask) {
>> if (ssc_p->initialized) {
>> @@ -369,7 +363,6 @@ static void atmel_ssc_shutdown(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
>> ssc_p->cmr_div = ssc_p->tcmr_period = ssc_p->rcmr_period = 0;
>> ssc_p->forced_divider = 0;
>> }
>> - spin_unlock_irq(&ssc_p->lock);
>>
>> /* Shutdown the SSC clock. */
>> pr_debug("atmel_ssc_dai: Stopping clock\n");
>> --
>> 2.23.0
>>
>
> --
> Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com
--
Gregory Clement, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists