[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190918134003.GF1908968@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 15:40:03 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/50] 4.19.74-stable review
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 05:59:09AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 9/17/19 11:18 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.74 release.
> > There are 50 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Fri 20 Sep 2019 06:09:47 AM UTC.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
>
> I see lots of build failures.
>
> kernel/module.c: In function 'free_module':
> kernel/module.c:2187:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'disable_ro_nx'; did you mean 'disable_irq'?
>
> kernel/module.c: In function 'load_module':
> kernel/module.c:3828:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'module_disable_nx'; did you mean 'module_disable_ro'?
>
> Reverting
>
> ed510bd0bce3 modules: fix compile error if don't have strict module rwx
> 22afe9550160 modules: fix BUG when load module with rodata=n
>
> fixes the problem.
Ugh, I thought I got these right. Let me see what I got wrong in the
backport...
Any hint as to what the .config is here that is causing the problems?
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists