[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190918142017.GC9880@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 07:20:17 -0700
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Jia He <justin.he@....com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Suzuki Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>,
Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@...il.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Jun Yao <yaojun8558363@...il.com>,
Alex Van Brunt <avanbrunt@...dia.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>, hejianet@...il.com,
Kaly Xin <Kaly.Xin@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] arm64: cpufeature: introduce helper
cpu_has_hw_af()
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 09:19:12PM +0800, Jia He wrote:
> +/* Decouple AF from AFDBM. */
> +bool cpu_has_hw_af(void)
> +{
> + return (read_cpuid(ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1) & 0xf);
> +}
> +
Do you really want to call read_cpuid() every time? I would have thought
you'd want to use the static branch mechanism to do the right thing at
boot time. See Documentation/static-keys.txt.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists