linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.2 047/124] netfilter: ebtables: Fix argument order to ADD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190919214820.714652168@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 20 Sep 2019 00:02:15 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Todd Seidelmann <tseidelmann@...ode.com>,
        Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.2 047/124] netfilter: ebtables: Fix argument order to ADD_COUNTER

From: Todd Seidelmann <tseidelmann@...ode.com>

[ Upstream commit f20faa06d83de440bec8e200870784c3458793c4 ]

The ordering of arguments to the x_tables ADD_COUNTER macro
appears to be wrong in ebtables (cf. ip_tables.c, ip6_tables.c,
and arp_tables.c).

This causes data corruption in the ebtables userspace tools
because they get incorrect packet & byte counts from the kernel.

Fixes: d72133e628803 ("netfilter: ebtables: use ADD_COUNTER macro")
Signed-off-by: Todd Seidelmann <tseidelmann@...ode.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c
index c8177a89f52c3..4096d8a74a2bd 100644
--- a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c
+++ b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ unsigned int ebt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
 			return NF_DROP;
 		}
 
-		ADD_COUNTER(*(counter_base + i), 1, skb->len);
+		ADD_COUNTER(*(counter_base + i), skb->len, 1);
 
 		/* these should only watch: not modify, nor tell us
 		 * what to do with the packet
@@ -959,8 +959,8 @@ static void get_counters(const struct ebt_counter *oldcounters,
 			continue;
 		counter_base = COUNTER_BASE(oldcounters, nentries, cpu);
 		for (i = 0; i < nentries; i++)
-			ADD_COUNTER(counters[i], counter_base[i].pcnt,
-				    counter_base[i].bcnt);
+			ADD_COUNTER(counters[i], counter_base[i].bcnt,
+				    counter_base[i].pcnt);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -1280,7 +1280,7 @@ static int do_update_counters(struct net *net, const char *name,
 
 	/* we add to the counters of the first cpu */
 	for (i = 0; i < num_counters; i++)
-		ADD_COUNTER(t->private->counters[i], tmp[i].pcnt, tmp[i].bcnt);
+		ADD_COUNTER(t->private->counters[i], tmp[i].bcnt, tmp[i].pcnt);
 
 	write_unlock_bh(&t->lock);
 	ret = 0;
-- 
2.20.1