[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190919214747.939647334@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 00:03:49 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 08/56] sctp: use transport pf_retrans in sctp_do_8_2_transport_strike
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
[ Upstream commit 10eb56c582c557c629271f1ee31e15e7a9b2558b ]
Transport should use its own pf_retrans to do the error_count
check, instead of asoc's. Otherwise, it's meaningless to make
pf_retrans per transport.
Fixes: 5aa93bcf66f4 ("sctp: Implement quick failover draft from tsvwg")
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
+++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
@@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ static void sctp_do_8_2_transport_strike
*/
if ((transport->state == SCTP_ACTIVE) &&
(transport->error_count < transport->pathmaxrxt) &&
- (transport->error_count > asoc->pf_retrans)) {
+ (transport->error_count > transport->pf_retrans)) {
sctp_assoc_control_transport(asoc, transport,
SCTP_TRANSPORT_PF,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists