linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.2 037/124] ARM: OMAP2+: Fix omap4 errata warning on other SoCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190919214820.363334347@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 20 Sep 2019 00:02:05 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.2 037/124] ARM: OMAP2+: Fix omap4 errata warning on other SoCs

From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>

[ Upstream commit 45da5e09dd32fa98c32eaafe2513db6bd75e2f4f ]

We have errata i688 workaround produce warnings on SoCs other than
omap4 and omap5:

omap4_sram_init:Unable to allocate sram needed to handle errata I688
omap4_sram_init:Unable to get sram pool needed to handle errata I688

This is happening because there is no ti,omap4-mpu node, or no SRAM
to configure for the other SoCs, so let's remove the warning based
on the SoC revision checks.

As nobody has complained it seems that the other SoC variants do not
need this workaround.

Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c
index f9c02f9f1c921..5c3845730dbf5 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c
@@ -127,6 +127,9 @@ static int __init omap4_sram_init(void)
 	struct device_node *np;
 	struct gen_pool *sram_pool;
 
+	if (!soc_is_omap44xx() && !soc_is_omap54xx())
+		return 0;
+
 	np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "ti,omap4-mpu");
 	if (!np)
 		pr_warn("%s:Unable to allocate sram needed to handle errata I688\n",
-- 
2.20.1