| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <e14ea48acef0776bd3bd442074441288@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 16:39:27 -0700
From: mnalajal@...eaurora.org
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>, rafael@...nel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] base: soc: Export soc_device_to_device API
On 2019-09-19 15:45, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 03:40:17PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>> On Thu 19 Sep 15:25 PDT 2019, Greg KH wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 03:14:56PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>> > > On Thu 19 Sep 14:58 PDT 2019, Greg KH wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 02:53:00PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>> > > > > On Thu 19 Sep 14:32 PDT 2019, Greg KH wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 02:13:44PM -0700, Murali Nalajala wrote:
>> > > > > > > If the soc drivers want to add custom sysfs entries it needs to
>> > > > > > > access "dev" field in "struct soc_device". This can be achieved
>> > > > > > > by "soc_device_to_device" API. Soc drivers which are built as a
>> > > > > > > module they need above API to be exported. Otherwise one can
>> > > > > > > observe compilation issues.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Murali Nalajala <mnalajal@...eaurora.org>
>> > > > > > > ---
>> > > > > > > drivers/base/soc.c | 1 +
>> > > > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/base/soc.c b/drivers/base/soc.c
>> > > > > > > index 7c0c5ca..4ad52f6 100644
>> > > > > > > --- a/drivers/base/soc.c
>> > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/base/soc.c
>> > > > > > > @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ struct device *soc_device_to_device(struct soc_device *soc_dev)
>> > > > > > > {
>> > > > > > > return &soc_dev->dev;
>> > > > > > > }
>> > > > > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(soc_device_to_device);
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > static umode_t soc_attribute_mode(struct kobject *kobj,
>> > > > > > > struct attribute *attr,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > What in-kernel driver needs this?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Half of the drivers interacting with the soc driver calls this API,
>> > > > > several of these I see no reason for being builtin (e.g.
>> > > > > ux500 andversatile). So I think this patch makes sense to allow us to
>> > > > > build these as modules.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Is linux-next breaking without this?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > No, we postponed the addition of any sysfs attributes in the Qualcomm
>> > > > > socinfo driver.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > We don't export things unless we have a user of the export.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Also, adding "custom" sysfs attributes is almost always not the correct
>> > > > > > thing to do at all. The driver should be doing it, by setting up the
>> > > > > > attribute group properly so that the driver core can do it automatically
>> > > > > > for it.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > No driver should be doing individual add/remove of sysfs files. If it
>> > > > > > does so, it is almost guaranteed to be doing it incorrectly and racing
>> > > > > > userspace.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > The problem here is that the attributes are expected to be attached to
>> > > > > the soc driver, which is separate from the platform-specific drivers. So
>> > > > > there's no way to do platform specific attributes the right way.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > And yes, there's loads of in-kernel examples of doing this wrong, I've
>> > > > > > been working on fixing that up, look at the patches now in Linus's tree
>> > > > > > for platform and USB drivers that do this as examples of how to do it
>> > > > > > right.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Agreed, this patch should not be used as an approval for any crazy
>> > > > > attributes; but it's necessary in order to extend the soc device's
>> > > > > attributes, per the current design.
>> > > >
>> > > > Wait, no, let's not let the "current design" remain if it is broken!
>> > > >
>> > > > Why can't the soc driver handle the attributes properly so that the
>> > > > individual driver doesn't have to do the create/remove?
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > The custom attributes that these drivers want to add to the common ones
>> > > are known in advance, so I presume we could have them passed into
>> > > soc_device_register() and registered together with the common
>> > > attributes...
>> > >
>> > > It sounds like it's worth a prototype.
>> >
>> > Do you have an in-kernel example I can look at to get an idea of what is
>> > needed here?
>> >
>>
>> realview_soc_probe(), in drivers/soc/versatile/soc-realview.c,
>> implements the current mechanism of acquiring the soc's struct device
>> and then issuing a few device_create_file calls on that.
>
> That looks to be a trivial driver to fix up. Look at 6d03c140db2e
> ("USB: phy: fsl-usb: convert platform driver to use dev_groups") as an
> example of how to do this.
>
> Also gotta love the total lack of error checking when calling
> device_create_file() in that driver :(
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
You can see example here
https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/msm/+/android-7.1.0_r0.2/drivers/soc/qcom/socinfo.c#1356
I want to add the custom entries to "soc" device path. This can be
achieved if i go with "dev_groups"?
sys/devices/soc0 # ls -l
total 0
-r--r--r-- 1 root 0 4096 Jan 1 00:01 family
-r--r--r-- 1 root 0 4096 Jan 1 00:01 machine
drwxr-xr-x 2 root 0 0 Jan 1 00:01 power
-r--r--r-- 1 root 0 4096 Jan 1 00:01 revision
-r--r--r-- 1 root 0 4096 Jan 1 00:01 serial_number
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root 0 0 Jan 1 00:01 subsystem ->
../../bus/soc
-rw-r--r-- 1 root 0 4096 Jan 1 00:01 uevent
Powered by blists - more mailing lists