lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 19 Sep 2019 09:59:11 +0200
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@....de>
Cc:     "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: threads-max observe limits

On Wed 18-09-19 09:15:41, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 17-09-19 12:26:18, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
[...]
> > b) Not being able to bump threads_max to the physical limit of
> >    the machine is very clearly a regression.
> 
> ... exactly this part. The changelog of the respective patch doesn't
> really exaplain why it is needed except of "it sounds like a good idea
> to be consistent".

Any take on this Heinrich? If there really is not strong reasoning about
the restricting user input then I will suggest reverting 16db3d3f1170
("kernel/sysctl.c: threads-max observe limits")

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ