[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190919075911.GA15782@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 09:59:11 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@....de>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: threads-max observe limits
On Wed 18-09-19 09:15:41, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 17-09-19 12:26:18, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
[...]
> > b) Not being able to bump threads_max to the physical limit of
> > the machine is very clearly a regression.
>
> ... exactly this part. The changelog of the respective patch doesn't
> really exaplain why it is needed except of "it sounds like a good idea
> to be consistent".
Any take on this Heinrich? If there really is not strong reasoning about
the restricting user input then I will suggest reverting 16db3d3f1170
("kernel/sysctl.c: threads-max observe limits")
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists