lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190919080008.GG9720@e119886-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 Sep 2019 09:00:09 +0100
From:   Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@....com>
To:     Denis Efremov <efremov@...ux.com>
Cc:     Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        Sebastian Ott <sebott@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/26] s390/pci: Use PCI_STD_NUM_BARS

On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 05:26:59PM +0300, Denis Efremov wrote:
> On 9/18/19 11:58 AM, Andrew Murray wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 11:41:38PM +0300, Denis Efremov wrote:
> >> Remove local definition PCI_BAR_COUNT for the number of PCI BARs and use
> >> global one PCI_STD_NUM_BARS instead.
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Sebastian Ott <sebott@...ux.ibm.com>
> >> Cc: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov <efremov@...ux.com>
> >> ---
> >>  arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h     |  5 +----
> >>  arch/s390/include/asm/pci_clp.h |  6 +++---
> >>  arch/s390/pci/pci.c             | 16 ++++++++--------
> >>  arch/s390/pci/pci_clp.c         |  6 +++---
> >>  4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h
> >> index a2399eff84ca..3a06c264ea53 100644
> >> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h
> >> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h
> >> @@ -2,9 +2,6 @@
> >>  #ifndef __ASM_S390_PCI_H
> >>  #define __ASM_S390_PCI_H
> >>  
> >> -/* must be set before including pci_clp.h */
> >> -#define PCI_BAR_COUNT	6
> >> -
> >>  #include <linux/pci.h>
> >>  #include <linux/mutex.h>
> >>  #include <linux/iommu.h>
> >> @@ -138,7 +135,7 @@ struct zpci_dev {
> >>  
> >>  	char res_name[16];
> >>  	bool mio_capable;
> >> -	struct zpci_bar_struct bars[PCI_BAR_COUNT];
> >> +	struct zpci_bar_struct bars[PCI_STD_NUM_BARS];
> >>  
> >>  	u64		start_dma;	/* Start of available DMA addresses */
> >>  	u64		end_dma;	/* End of available DMA addresses */
> >> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_clp.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_clp.h
> >> index 50359172cc48..bd2cb4ea7d93 100644
> >> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_clp.h
> >> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_clp.h
> >> @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ struct mio_info {
> >>  	struct {
> >>  		u64 wb;
> >>  		u64 wt;
> >> -	} addr[PCI_BAR_COUNT];
> >> +	} addr[PCI_STD_NUM_BARS];
> >>  	u32 reserved[6];
> >>  } __packed;
> >>  
> >> @@ -98,9 +98,9 @@ struct clp_rsp_query_pci {
> >>  	u16 util_str_avail	:  1;	/* utility string available? */
> >>  	u16 pfgid		:  8;	/* pci function group id */
> >>  	u32 fid;			/* pci function id */
> >> -	u8 bar_size[PCI_BAR_COUNT];
> >> +	u8 bar_size[PCI_STD_NUM_BARS];
> >>  	u16 pchid;
> >> -	__le32 bar[PCI_BAR_COUNT];
> >> +	__le32 bar[PCI_STD_NUM_BARS];
> >>  	u8 pfip[CLP_PFIP_NR_SEGMENTS];	/* pci function internal path */
> >>  	u32			: 16;
> >>  	u8 fmb_len;
> >> diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
> >> index b0e3b9a0e488..aca372c8e34f 100644
> >> --- a/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
> >> +++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
> >> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ static DECLARE_BITMAP(zpci_domain, ZPCI_NR_DEVICES);
> >>  static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(zpci_domain_lock);
> >>  
> >>  #define ZPCI_IOMAP_ENTRIES						\
> >> -	min(((unsigned long) ZPCI_NR_DEVICES * PCI_BAR_COUNT / 2),	\
> >> +	min(((unsigned long) ZPCI_NR_DEVICES * PCI_STD_NUM_BARS / 2),	\
> >>  	    ZPCI_IOMAP_MAX_ENTRIES)
> >>  
> >>  static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(zpci_iomap_lock);
> >> @@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ static void __iomem *pci_iomap_range_mio(struct pci_dev *pdev, int bar,
> >>  void __iomem *pci_iomap_range(struct pci_dev *pdev, int bar,
> >>  			      unsigned long offset, unsigned long max)
> >>  {
> >> -	if (!pci_resource_len(pdev, bar) || bar >= PCI_BAR_COUNT)
> >> +	if (bar >= PCI_STD_NUM_BARS || !pci_resource_len(pdev, bar))
> >>  		return NULL;
> >>  
> >>  	if (static_branch_likely(&have_mio))
> >> @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static void __iomem *pci_iomap_wc_range_mio(struct pci_dev *pdev, int bar,
> >>  void __iomem *pci_iomap_wc_range(struct pci_dev *pdev, int bar,
> >>  				 unsigned long offset, unsigned long max)
> >>  {
> >> -	if (!pci_resource_len(pdev, bar) || bar >= PCI_BAR_COUNT)
> >> +	if (bar >= PCI_STD_NUM_BARS || !pci_resource_len(pdev, bar))
> >>  		return NULL;
> > 
> > This looks like a latent bug fix here. If 'bar' is out of range we return
> > NULL instead accessing an invalid item of an array. Should this not be
> > a separate patch and tagged as stable?
> > 
> 
> This fix was suggested by Bjorn in v1 review:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/8/12/997
> 

Ah yes, apologies - I'll re-read the previous threads next time.

Thanks,

Andrew Murray

> 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Andrew Murray
> > 
> >>  
> >>  	if (static_branch_likely(&have_mio))
> >> @@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ static void zpci_map_resources(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> >>  	resource_size_t len;
> >>  	int i;
> >>  
> >> -	for (i = 0; i < PCI_BAR_COUNT; i++) {
> >> +	for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; i++) {
> >>  		len = pci_resource_len(pdev, i);
> >>  		if (!len)
> >>  			continue;
> >> @@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ static void zpci_unmap_resources(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> >>  	if (zpci_use_mio(zdev))
> >>  		return;
> >>  
> >> -	for (i = 0; i < PCI_BAR_COUNT; i++) {
> >> +	for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; i++) {
> >>  		len = pci_resource_len(pdev, i);
> >>  		if (!len)
> >>  			continue;
> >> @@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ static int zpci_setup_bus_resources(struct zpci_dev *zdev,
> >>  	snprintf(zdev->res_name, sizeof(zdev->res_name),
> >>  		 "PCI Bus %04x:%02x", zdev->domain, ZPCI_BUS_NR);
> >>  
> >> -	for (i = 0; i < PCI_BAR_COUNT; i++) {
> >> +	for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; i++) {
> >>  		if (!zdev->bars[i].size)
> >>  			continue;
> >>  		entry = zpci_alloc_iomap(zdev);
> >> @@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ static void zpci_cleanup_bus_resources(struct zpci_dev *zdev)
> >>  {
> >>  	int i;
> >>  
> >> -	for (i = 0; i < PCI_BAR_COUNT; i++) {
> >> +	for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; i++) {
> >>  		if (!zdev->bars[i].size || !zdev->bars[i].res)
> >>  			continue;
> >>  
> >> @@ -573,7 +573,7 @@ int pcibios_add_device(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> >>  	pdev->dev.dma_ops = &s390_pci_dma_ops;
> >>  	zpci_map_resources(pdev);
> >>  
> >> -	for (i = 0; i < PCI_BAR_COUNT; i++) {
> >> +	for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; i++) {
> >>  		res = &pdev->resource[i];
> >>  		if (res->parent || !res->flags)
> >>  			continue;
> >> diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci_clp.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci_clp.c
> >> index 9bdff4defef1..8b729b5f2972 100644
> >> --- a/arch/s390/pci/pci_clp.c
> >> +++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci_clp.c
> >> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static int clp_store_query_pci_fn(struct zpci_dev *zdev,
> >>  {
> >>  	int i;
> >>  
> >> -	for (i = 0; i < PCI_BAR_COUNT; i++) {
> >> +	for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; i++) {
> >>  		zdev->bars[i].val = le32_to_cpu(response->bar[i]);
> >>  		zdev->bars[i].size = response->bar_size[i];
> >>  	}
> >> @@ -164,8 +164,8 @@ static int clp_store_query_pci_fn(struct zpci_dev *zdev,
> >>  		       sizeof(zdev->util_str));
> >>  	}
> >>  	zdev->mio_capable = response->mio_addr_avail;
> >> -	for (i = 0; i < PCI_BAR_COUNT; i++) {
> >> -		if (!(response->mio.valid & (1 << (PCI_BAR_COUNT - i - 1))))
> >> +	for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; i++) {
> >> +		if (!(response->mio.valid & (1 << (PCI_STD_NUM_BARS - i - 1))))
> >>  			continue;
> >>  
> >>  		zdev->bars[i].mio_wb = (void __iomem *) response->mio.addr[i].wb;
> >> -- 
> >> 2.21.0
> >>
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ