[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <A91B8FA0-50F3-44FC-9466-F8569EA89C99@holtmann.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 14:36:18 +0200
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
Alex Lu <alex_lu@...lsil.com.cn>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
Rajat Jain <rajatja@...gle.com>,
Raghuram Hegde <raghuram.hegde@...el.com>,
Bluez mailing list <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: btusb: avoid unused function warning
Hi Arnd,
>>> The btusb_rtl_cmd_timeout() function is used inside of an
>>> ifdef, leading to a warning when this part is hidden
>>> from the compiler:
>>>
>>> drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c:530:13: error: unused function 'btusb_rtl_cmd_timeout' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
>>>
>>> Use an IS_ENABLED() check instead so the compiler can see
>>> the code and then discard it silently.
>>>
>>> Fixes: d7ef0d1e3968 ("Bluetooth: btusb: Use cmd_timeout to reset Realtek device")
>>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 5 ++---
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
>>> index a9c35ebb30f8..23e606aaaea4 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
>>> @@ -3807,8 +3807,8 @@ static int btusb_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
>>> btusb_check_needs_reset_resume(intf);
>>> }
>>>
>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_BT_HCIBTUSB_RTL
>>> - if (id->driver_info & BTUSB_REALTEK) {
>>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BT_HCIBTUSB_RTL) &&
>>> + (id->driver_info & BTUSB_REALTEK)) {
>>> hdev->setup = btrtl_setup_realtek;
>>> hdev->shutdown = btrtl_shutdown_realtek;
>>> hdev->cmd_timeout = btusb_rtl_cmd_timeout;
>>> @@ -3819,7 +3819,6 @@ static int btusb_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
>>> */
>>> set_bit(BTUSB_WAKEUP_DISABLE, &data->flags);
>>> }
>>> -#endif
>>
>> I prefer that we stick another ifdef around the btusb_rtl_cmd_timeout function since that
>> is how we did it for the other vendors as well.
>
> Ok. Can you just commit that with 'Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>'?
>
>> However I start to wonder if we need all these vendor ifdef anyway. The vendor specific
>> functions should turn into empty stubs if their support is not selected.
>
> It just wastes a little bit of object code space, which my approach
> above avoids.
>
> I guess one could also be clever and redefine those macros like
>
> #define BTUSB_REALTEK (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BT_HCIBTUSB_RTL) ? 0x20000 : 0)
>
> so the if() section gets silently dropped, in addition to treating
> zero like BTUSB_IGNORE.
we could do that as well. I just want it to be consistent in the code.
Regards
Marcel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists