lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190919145027.GN3642@sirena.co.uk>
Date:   Thu, 19 Sep 2019 15:50:27 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@....com>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Miao Xie <miaoxie@...wei.com>,
        Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: erofs -next tree inclusion request

On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 10:37:22PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:

> The fixes only -fixes branch is
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xiang/erofs.git fixes

> Thanks for taking time on this stuff...

OK, thanks - I've added that for tomorrow and I'll try to remember to
add it onto the end of today's build too.  Like I said before you might
need to remind Stephen about the trees when he gets back on the 30th but
hopefully he'll see these mails.

Thanks for adding your subsystem tree as a participant of linux-next.  As
you may know, this is not a judgement of your code.  The purpose of
linux-next is for integration testing and to lower the impact of
conflicts between subsystems in the next merge window.

You will need to ensure that the patches/commits in your tree/series have
been:
     * submitted under GPL v2 (or later) and include the Contributor's
        Signed-off-by,
     * posted to the relevant mailing list,
     * reviewed by you (or another maintainer of your subsystem tree),
     * successfully unit tested, and
     * destined for the current or next Linux merge window.

Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him
to fetch).  It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ