linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v2 0/4] spi: dw: Add basic runtime PM support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <TYAPR01MB292515FE4C74044CA53321C5DF890@TYAPR01MB2925.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 Sep 2019 15:14:54 +0000
From:   Gareth Williams <gareth.williams.jx@...esas.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@...esas.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        "linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 0/4] spi: dw: Add basic runtime PM support

Hi Mark,

On Wed, Sep 19, 2019 at 14:31:32AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 09:04:32AM +0100, Gareth Williams wrote:
> 
> > Gareth Williams (1):
> >   dt-bindings: snps,dw-apb-ssi: Add optional clock domain information
> >
> > Phil Edworthy (3):
> >   dt: spi: Add Renesas RZ/N1 binding documentation
> 
> Please use subject lines matching the style for the subsystem.  This makes it
> easier for people to identify relevant patches.  This isn't even consistent
> within the series :(
Sorry about that, I will correct the subject lines for V3.
Is there a set convention for the subsystem I should follow in future?
Or should I follow the style of the individual files I work on?

Kind Regards,

Gareth