[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190919161613.GR237523@dtor-ws>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 09:16:13 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Rishi Gupta <gupt21@...il.com>
Cc: jikos@...nel.org, benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] HID: hidraw: replace printk() with corresponding
pr_xx() variant
Hi Rishi,
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 09:59:11PM +0530, Rishi Gupta wrote:
> This commit replaces direct invocations of printk with
> their appropriate pr_info/warn() variant.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rishi Gupta <gupt21@...il.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Removed manually adding prefix "hidraw:".
>
> drivers/hid/hidraw.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hidraw.c b/drivers/hid/hidraw.c
> index 006bd6f..2d082f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hidraw.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hidraw.c
> @@ -197,14 +197,14 @@ static ssize_t hidraw_get_report(struct file *file, char __user *buffer, size_t
> }
>
> if (count > HID_MAX_BUFFER_SIZE) {
> - printk(KERN_WARNING "hidraw: pid %d passed too large report\n",
> + pr_warn("pid %d passed too large report\n",
> task_pid_nr(current));
It looks like here and in the instance below you actually have a hid
device, so you can use hid_warn() instead of pr_warn(), similarly to
hidraw_send_report().
The change to pr_info() in hidraw_init() is good.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists