linux-kernel - Re: [xfs] 27d1053021: xfstests.xfs.173.fail

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190919215625.GA13358@lst.de>
Date:   Thu, 19 Sep 2019 23:56:25 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...org
Subject: Re: [xfs] 27d1053021: xfstests.xfs.173.fail

On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 07:47:05PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 09:46:02AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-7):
> > 
> > commit: 27d10530217ee6d6a0388014fd773820ee354ce5 ("xfs: remove the unused XFS_ALLOC_USERDATA flag")
> 
> Well, this does not make a whole lot of sense, given that the patch
> literally just removes an unused flag.  that being said that test has
> been father flakey for me for a long time.

But the weird part is that it actually reproduces here with 1k block
size file system despite make no sense at all..