linux-kernel - [RFC][PATCH RT 2/7] fs/aio: simple simple work

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190920215621.597676075@goodmis.org>
Date:   Fri, 20 Sep 2019 17:53:13 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
        Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
        Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>,
        Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>, tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com,
        Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
        Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH RT 2/7] fs/aio: simple simple work

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>

[ Upstream commit 1a142116f6435ef070ecebb66d2d599507c10601 ]

|BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:768
|in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 26, name: rcuos/2
|2 locks held by rcuos/2/26:
| #0:  (rcu_callback){.+.+..}, at: [<ffffffff810b1a12>] rcu_nocb_kthread+0x1e2/0x380
| #1:  (rcu_read_lock_sched){.+.+..}, at: [<ffffffff812acd26>] percpu_ref_kill_rcu+0xa6/0x1c0
|Preemption disabled at:[<ffffffff810b1a93>] rcu_nocb_kthread+0x263/0x380
|Call Trace:
| [<ffffffff81582e9e>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x9c
| [<ffffffff81077aeb>] __might_sleep+0xfb/0x170
| [<ffffffff81589304>] rt_spin_lock+0x24/0x70
| [<ffffffff811c5790>] free_ioctx_users+0x30/0x130
| [<ffffffff812ace34>] percpu_ref_kill_rcu+0x1b4/0x1c0
| [<ffffffff810b1a93>] rcu_nocb_kthread+0x263/0x380
| [<ffffffff8106e046>] kthread+0xd6/0xf0
| [<ffffffff81591eec>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0

replace this preempt_disable() friendly swork.

Reported-By: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
Suggested-by: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
 fs/aio.c | 13 +++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/aio.c b/fs/aio.c
index 911e23087dfb..0c613d805bf1 100644
--- a/fs/aio.c
+++ b/fs/aio.c
@@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ struct kioctx {
 	long			nr_pages;
 
 	struct rcu_work		free_rwork;	/* see free_ioctx() */
+	struct kthread_work	free_kwork;	/* see free_ioctx() */
 
 	/*
 	 * signals when all in-flight requests are done
@@ -606,9 +607,9 @@ static void free_ioctx_reqs(struct percpu_ref *ref)
  * and ctx->users has dropped to 0, so we know no more kiocbs can be submitted -
  * now it's safe to cancel any that need to be.
  */
-static void free_ioctx_users(struct percpu_ref *ref)
+static void free_ioctx_users_work(struct kthread_work *work)
 {
-	struct kioctx *ctx = container_of(ref, struct kioctx, users);
+	struct kioctx *ctx = container_of(work, struct kioctx, free_kwork);
 	struct aio_kiocb *req;
 
 	spin_lock_irq(&ctx->ctx_lock);
@@ -626,6 +627,14 @@ static void free_ioctx_users(struct percpu_ref *ref)
 	percpu_ref_put(&ctx->reqs);
 }
 
+static void free_ioctx_users(struct percpu_ref *ref)
+{
+	struct kioctx *ctx = container_of(ref, struct kioctx, users);
+
+	kthread_init_work(&ctx->free_kwork, free_ioctx_users_work);
+	kthread_schedule_work(&ctx->free_kwork);
+}
+
 static int ioctx_add_table(struct kioctx *ctx, struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
 	unsigned i, new_nr;
-- 
2.20.1