lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHLCerPqEK2sSGGtDj85DH+qCzgtWi4ainuQv8BgQ3-Dgi93BQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 20 Sep 2019 15:07:25 -0700
From:   Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/15] arm64: dts: msm8996: thermal: Add interrupt support

On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 3:02 PM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> Quoting Amit Kucheria (2019-09-20 14:52:24)
> > Register upper-lower interrupts for each of the two tsens controllers.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi | 60 ++++++++++++++-------------
> >  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi
> > index 96c0a481f454..bb763b362c16 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi
> > @@ -175,8 +175,8 @@
> >
> >         thermal-zones {
> >                 cpu0-thermal {
> > -                       polling-delay-passive = <250>;
> > -                       polling-delay = <1000>;
> > +                       polling-delay-passive = <0>;
> > +                       polling-delay = <0>;
>
> I thought the plan was to make this unnecessary to change?

IMO that change should be part of a different series to the thermal
core. I've not actually started working on it yet (traveling for the
next 10 days or so) but plan to do it.

Regards,
Amit

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ