[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190920093700.7nfaghxdrmubp2do@willie-the-truck>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 10:38:06 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, mripard@...nel.org,
sean@...rly.run, airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
jslaby@...e.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com,
rodrigo.vivi@...el.com, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
tytso@....edu, jack@...e.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
tj@...nel.org, mark@...heh.com, jlbec@...lplan.or,
joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com, ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com,
davem@...emloft.net, daniel@...earbox.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, duyuyang@...il.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, hannes@...xchg.org, mhocko@...nel.org,
vdavydov.dev@...il.com, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, alexander.levin@...rosoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] treewide: remove unused argument in lock_release()
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 12:09:40PM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> Since the commit b4adfe8e05f1 ("locking/lockdep: Remove unused argument
> in __lock_release"), @nested is no longer used in lock_release(), so
> remove it from all lock_release() calls and friends.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
> ---
Although this looks fine to me at a first glance, it might be slightly
easier to manage if you hit {spin,rwlock,seqcount,mutex,rwsem}_release()
first with coccinelle scripts, and then hack lock_release() as a final
patch. That way it's easy to regenerate things if needed.
Cheers,
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists