[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190920122030.14340-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 14:20:30 +0200
From: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] pinctl: ti: iodelay: fix error checking on pinctrl_count_index_with_args call
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
The call to pinctrl_count_index_with_args checks for a -EINVAL return
however this function calls pinctrl_get_list_and_count and this can
return -ENOENT. Rather than check for a specific error, fix this by
checking for any error return to catch the -ENOENT case.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Improper use of negative")
Fixes: 003910ebc83b ("pinctrl: Introduce TI IOdelay configuration driver")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
---
drivers/pinctrl/ti/pinctrl-ti-iodelay.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/ti/pinctrl-ti-iodelay.c b/drivers/pinctrl/ti/pinctrl-ti-iodelay.c
index e5e7f1f22813..b522ca010332 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/ti/pinctrl-ti-iodelay.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/ti/pinctrl-ti-iodelay.c
@@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ static int ti_iodelay_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
return -EINVAL;
rows = pinctrl_count_index_with_args(np, name);
- if (rows == -EINVAL)
+ if (rows < 0)
return rows;
*map = devm_kzalloc(iod->dev, sizeof(**map), GFP_KERNEL);
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists