lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <206f8d57-dad9-26c3-6bf6-1d000f5698d4@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 20 Sep 2019 20:21:53 +0800
From:   Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@...wei.com>
To:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
CC:     <dwmw2@...radead.org>, <dilinger@...ued.net>, <richard@....at>,
        <houtao1@...wei.com>, <bbrezillon@...nel.org>,
        <daniel.santos@...ox.com>, <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] jffs2:freely allocate memory when parameters are invalid



On 2019/9/20 19:43, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 02:54:38PM +0800, Xiaoming Ni wrote:
>> Use kzalloc() to allocate memory in jffs2_fill_super().
>> Freeing memory when jffs2_parse_options() fails will cause
>> use-after-free and double-free in jffs2_kill_sb()
> 
> ... so we are not freeing it there.  What's the problem?

No code logic issues, no memory leaks

But there is too much code logic between memory allocation and free,
which is difficult to understand.

The modified code is easier to understand.

thanks

Xiaoming Ni

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ