[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190920122815.GB26862@pi3>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 14:28:15 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
Maciej Falkowski <m.falkowski@...sung.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: exynos: split phandle in dmas property
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 02:14:30PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> From: Maciej Falkowski <m.falkowski@...sung.com>
>
> Change representation of phandle array as then
> dt-schema counts number of its items properly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maciej Falkowski <m.falkowski@...sung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 14 +++++++-------
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5410.dtsi | 6 +++---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 14 +++++++-------
> 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
Looks good, I'll take it after merge window but why this is in-reply-to
(inside thread) of completely different patchset?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists