[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e86441c4-9ce2-b0f2-f8ca-2823497b4d6d@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 17:07:26 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: "Sverdlin, Alexander (Nokia - DE/Ulm)" <alexander.sverdlin@...ia.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
"Glavinic-Pecotic, Matija (EXT - DE/Ulm)"
<matija.glavinic-pecotic.ext@...ia.com>,
"Adamski, Krzysztof (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw)"
<krzysztof.adamski@...ia.com>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] genirq/irqdomain: Detect type race in
irq_create_fwspec_mapping()
On 12/09/2019 10:44, Sverdlin, Alexander (Nokia - DE/Ulm) wrote:
> From: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...ia.com>
>
> irq_create_fwspec_mapping() can race with itself during IRQ trigger type
> configuration. Possible scenarios include:
>
> - Mapping exists, two irq_create_fwspec_mapping() running in parallel do
> not detect type mismatch, IRQ remains configured with one of the
> different trigger types randomly
> - Second call to irq_create_fwspec_mapping() sees existing mapping just
> created by first call, but earlier irqd_set_trigger_type() call races
> with later irqd_set_trigger_type() => totally undetected, IRQ type
> is being set randomly to either one or another type
Is that an actual thing? Frankly, the scenario you're describing here
seems to carry the hallmarks of a completely broken system. Can you
point at a system supported in mainline that would behave as such?
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists