[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPhsuW6zxkKd3ExXj5GCq+4yEWv85qmM9_Weatv4PoVd+aWKDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 09:13:04 -0700
From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@...il.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] perf/core: Add PERF_SAMPLE_CGROUP feature
Hi Namhyung,
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 1:47 AM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Hello Song,
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 3:43 PM Song Liu <liu.song.a23@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > Sharing some offline discussions with Tejun.
> >
> > ino in current kernfs is not a good unique ID for cgroup, because it doesn't
> > increase monotonically. So we need to improve kernfs.
> >
> > For 64-bit, we can make the ino monotonic, and use it as the ID.
> > For 32-bit, we need to make the ino monotonic. and use <ino> and <gen>
> > as the 64-bit ID.
>
> Thanks for the sharing information! For 32-bit, while the ino itself is not
> monotonic, gen << 32 + ino is monotonic right? I think we can use the
> same logic of kernfs id allocation, but not sure what the problem Tejun
> mentioned before is.
How would we manage gen here? One way that works is:
1. make ino monotonic,
2. increase gen when 32-bit ino overflows
I think current kernfs id is not monotonic, so it can be reused before overflow.
Thanks,
Song
Powered by blists - more mailing lists