lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2fde036a-f64e-ce58-65bf-a089e7c673aa@intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 20 Sep 2019 09:16:12 -0700
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     Wei Yang <richardw.yang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: fix return value of p[um]dp_set_access_flags

On 9/19/19 7:18 PM, Wei Yang wrote:
> Last but not least, since update_mmu_cache_pmd is empty, even return
> value is not correct, it doesn't break anything.

In other words, this patch has no functional effect and does not provide
a "fix".  What's the point of patching this stuff if it has no effect?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ